there are certain birthdays i cannot let go by unnoticed. samuel beckett's is most definitely one of them. i haven't read that much beckett. i have seen precious little of his work performed. but it is sure that the love of my life would not be who he is today without this man and his work... almost literally; for my love even took his name from the dangling florets of beckett's words. in my 'house,' the name beckett is virtually holy. i admit, i don't know very much about the man himself... except what i've learned through some hastened research. he was born 103 years ago today, in Ireland. he was a friend... or perhaps more accurately, and apprentice of james joyce. he was raised in a Dublin suburb with the superb name of Foxrock, in a large house complete with a garden and tennis court. he was involved in the French Resistance near the end of WWII. he was lucky enough to be recognized for his writing in his own time. and wow, the more i read of his biography, the more i realize i really shouldn't be the one writing this. his life was so varied and strange. so i'll stick to what i know. i used to have an audio recording of Lucky's Speech from 'waiting for godot' on a tape... used to play it in my headphones as i blew up balloons from a huge helium tank in the storage room of a restaurant i used to work in. it reminded me that brilliance and depth and meaning, as well as folly and balloons, both existed, and were necessary. and in the end, both unimportant. mmm, what else? oh yes, the photo. it probably goes without saying that there were clearer and more 'professional' -looking pictures of beckett available when i went diving for one, but for some reason, i just kept coming back to this one. perhaps because the hazy nature of it somehow illustrates the imcomplete picture i have of him, mentally... and also because i don't think i've ever seen it before. samuel, thank you... that's all i can say.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Sunday, April 12, 2009
last tango
i think i first saw 'last tango in paris' about 20 years ago. and i willingly admit the fact that i think i missed the point. the sex itself was not a shocker to me. i'd seen triple x films long before then. and i don't think i yet had the maturity required to really appreciate the meaning of 'last tango.' so i watched it again a couple of nights ago, and it brought me to tears by the end. like, heaving sobs. i was devastated by it. it might possibly be one of the saddest films i've ever seen... as well as one of the most brilliant. i think it goes without saying that when in was released in 1972 (the year i was born) it caused a scandalous sensation... both in the states, and overseas. directed by bernardo bertolucci, and starring marlon brando and the incredible maria schneider, it is a haunting tale of curiosity, introspection, regression, loss, personal discovery... and perhaps most importantly, control. notice i didn't mention sexuality? that is because i do not think the movie is about sex. sex is brilliantly implicated merely as a vehicle... it is the paint in which the deeper lessons are rendered and presented. so i popped the movie in, just planning to snatch some pretty shots, but it took hold of me and didn't let go. at several different points in the film, i identified with both schneider (jeanne), and brando. (paul.) they are, at different times, either cats or goldfish... entranced with one another in their respective personal habitats... gazing in amazement at one another... wanting lustfully for what the other one has and is... it is a crushing blow for each of them when they realize the truth. a cat and a goldfish can fall in love with eachother... but where are they going to live? if they decide to get close enough to really know eachother, one of them cannot survive. (click to enlarge)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)